# SG Commercialisation — a published vault

> A commercial operating model published in the open: nine tools to productise, eight agentic roles, the engagement procedure and every template — with the live engagement register deliberately empty.

*Source: <https://sgit.ai/demos/vaults/commercialisation/index.html> · site v0.2.48 · this file is generated from the same content as the page, so the two cannot drift. Every page on this site has a `.md` twin; internal links below point at them.*

---

[Home](../../../index.md) / [Vaults](../index.md) / SG Commercialisation

# SG Commercialisation

The commercial model itself, published rather than kept in a drive. Nine tools to productise, eight agentic roles, the pricing and partnership models, and the templates that run an engagement end to end. The register of live engagements is **empty**, and that is the honest state of it.

**Open it yourself — the key is the whole credential.**
 Read key: `sgit_rk1_3c8cba7edd2f14e63d0b0f0da4d513430e3eea06f364baefaf8b22d85e151da6:haeu7p1e`
 In the official UI: [open it read-only in a new tab](https://dev.vault.sgraph.ai/#sgit_rk1_3c8cba7edd2f14e63d0b0f0da4d513430e3eea06f364baefaf8b22d85e151da6%3Ahaeu7p1e) · From the CLI: `sgit clone sgit_rk1_3c8cba7edd2f14e63d0b0f0da4d513430e3eea06f364baefaf8b22d85e151da6:haeu7p1e`
Published deliberately, and **derived** one-way from a vault key that is not published and never will be.

## See it live, here

Both surfaces open automatically below. You can also [**open the app in its own window ↗**](https://dev.vault.sgraph.ai/#sgit_rk1_3c8cba7edd2f14e63d0b0f0da4d513430e3eea06f364baefaf8b22d85e151da6%3Ahaeu7p1e).

## What is in it

the thesis

### One problem, nine times

The opening claim is sharper than most strategy documents manage: *"the portfolio does not have nine problems, it has one problem nine times."* Nearly every tool is missing the same three things, and none of them is the tool — **purchase of tokens**, **a page to sell from**, and **users**.

So the work is described as *trimming a commercial workflow, not building a product*, taken to market through partners on time-bound, budget-defined mini-projects metered as on-demand hours. The bar is stated as break-even; the durable prize is the shipping-and-billing capability the whole portfolio needs.

The overview: nine tools, eight agentic roles, four source briefs — and the shared gap named as one problem nine times.

the register

### The most credible thing in it is a table with no rows

The engagement register has a **Live engagements** table containing a single row reading *none yet*, followed by an example row explicitly marked *delete once real rows exist*.

Every template underneath it is a placeholder — `<ENG-00X>`, `<Partner>`, `<rate, or rev-share reference>`. The hours-log template carries its own instruction: *never put card/bank details or tokens here.*

A commercial model published before it has any customers is easy to check later against what actually happened. That is the same wager the [sibling sites](../../../network/index.md) make.

The vault browser: the model, the team, the engagement templates.

## Notes

**Audited before publishing.** No email addresses, no rates, no partner names, no money figures other than `$0`. The eight "team" files are *agent role definitions* — Conductor, Ambassador, Alchemist, Commercial, Designer, Developer — not people.

[← All published vaults](../index.md)


---

*[Site index for agents](../../../llms.txt) · [HTML version](https://sgit.ai/demos/vaults/commercialisation/index.html)*
