# Story vault underneath, Reader Skills on top: what changed in v1.1.0, sgit.ai > The changes to the article "Story vault underneath, Reader Skills on top" in v1.1.0, paragraph by paragraph. *Source: · site v0.7.38 · this file is generated from the same content as the page, so the two cannot drift. Every page on this site has a `.md` twin; internal links below point at them.* --- [Home](../../../index.md) / [Articles](../../index.md) / [Story vault underneath, Reader Skills on top](../../story-vault-meets-reader-skills.md) / [Versions](../story-vault-meets-reader-skills.md) / v1.1.0 # Story vault underneath, Reader Skills on top: what changed in v1.1.0 From v1.0.0 (2026-10-07, `24e14a65e`) to v1.1.0 (2026-10-07, `9e71c7d67`), paragraph by paragraph. 4 paragraphs added, 0 removed, 0 changed in place, 38 unchanged. About 280 words added and 0 removed. Insertions are marked like this, deletions like this; unchanged runs are folded to one line; figures appear as their file names. [all versions](../story-vault-meets-reader-skills.md) · [v1.2.0 →](v1.2.0.md) 6 unchanged paragraphs [figure lu-chatgpt-infographic.webp] An infographic of Markus Franz's article, made with ChatGPT from the article's text. Faithful on the six skills, the layers and the safeguards; see the note below for what it adds and what it drops. | medium > **Reading the infographic against the article.** It gets the substance right: the gap, Liquid Utility, the six Reader Skills, the layered system, the safeguards and the advice to start small. Four things to know. The taglines ("Same facts. A more useful tomorrow", "People informed, people empowered, stronger societies", "Real journalism. Greater possibilities") and the line "Trust turns useful services into lasting relationships" are the infographic's, not Markus's. "An AI feature alone is not the advantage. Reliability is" is a fair compression, but his own wording is more careful: the publisher's case *would have to rest* on original access, maintained data, local reporting and accountability, and even then the service must be demonstrably better for a particular task. It drops his qualifiers, that the six skills are a proposed framework rather than a universal taxonomy and that reach, utility, relationship and reciprocity are a hypothesis to measure rather than a funnel. And it leaves out his evidence on search and clicks, and his boundary that "relevant to me" must not become "nothing beyond my immediate interests". 30 unchanged paragraphs, under Each Reader Skill is a question the graph can already answer, The bridge, drawn, What his article adds: the job, and the place… ## Played out in full The bridge, the readers, the journalism and the money are now a working simulation: [The bridge, followed to the end](../../../articles/the-bridge-followed-to-the-end.md), with its [vault](../../../demos/vaults/bridge-simulation/index.md). Three readers, four institutions and an agent use one local story kept as a graph, from the first notice to the reopening, and every payment walks back to the people who found the facts. 2 unchanged paragraphs [all versions](../story-vault-meets-reader-skills.md) · [v1.2.0 →](v1.2.0.md) --- *[Site index for agents](../../../llms.txt) · [HTML version](https://sgit.ai/articles/versions/story-vault-meets-reader-skills/v1.1.0.html)*